EN 
ES 
Arbitration
Herzog v. Sup. Ct
Case Details and Video Transcript: Filed 5/16/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LARA HERZOG et al.,
Case Details and Video Transcript: Filed 5/16/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LARA HERZOG et al.,
Case Details and Video Transcript: Filed 4/16/24 Certified for Publication 5/10/24 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE
California Appellate Court finds that employer did not meet its burden to show that employee’s electronic signature on an arbitration agreement was authentic.
No duty for Lyft to perform background checks on passengers, a California Court of Appeal finds.
The California Court of Appeal concludes that trial judge crossed the line in granting defendant’s motions to exclude plaintiff’s expert’s testimony at trial.
The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgement against the plaintiff. Of importance in its opinion was the finding relating to the plaintiff’s theory of res ipsa loquitor.
The Supreme Court of California decided three issues regarding the interpretation of “hours worked” in Wage Order 16. The answer generally turns on the level of control exercised by the employer.
California Court of Appeal gives opinion on the assumption of risk doctrine and surfing.
The California Supreme Court decided whether an employer can be imposed Labor Code sections 203 (waiting time) and 226 (inaccurate wage statements) penalties if it had a reasonable and good faith (albeit mistaken) belief that it was acting lawfully.
California Court of Appeal decides on a regional center ‘s scope of duty to third parties under the Lanterman Act after a third-party facility administrator is attacked by a developmentally disabled resident.