Case Details and Video Transcript: Filed 4/16/24 Certified for Publication 5/10/24 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE
No duty for Lyft to perform background checks on passengers, a California Court of Appeal finds.
The California Court of Appeal concludes that trial judge crossed the line in granting defendant’s motions to exclude plaintiff’s expert’s testimony at trial.
The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgement against the plaintiff. Of importance in its opinion was the finding relating to the plaintiff’s theory of res ipsa loquitor.
California Court of Appeal gives opinion on the assumption of risk doctrine and surfing.
California Court of Appeal decides on a regional center ‘s scope of duty to third parties under the Lanterman Act after a third-party facility administrator is attacked by a developmentally disabled resident.
EN 
ES